|
How did we evolve to this way of living? Evolution –
what a beautiful word (at least to scientists); the fundamental
mechanism behind the development of biological diversity and
complexity of life forms. Evolution also involves the extinction
of many species; sometimes through rare catastrophic events
and other times thorough pathways blindly followed to species
obsolescence. Among the youngest of species, homo sapiens,
is uniquely capable of informed choice and contemplating the
future. There was a time when humans worshipped many Gods
who were responsible for all change and so the future was
beyond prediction.
But in Genesis (41, v 14-57), Joseph, son of Jacob whom God
named Israel, was brought from a dungeon by Pharaoh who wanted
his dreams interpreted. Joseph told Pharaoh: “The dream
of Pharaoh is one; God has revealed to Pharaoh what he is
about to do. There will come seven years of great plenty throughout
all the land of Egypt, but then seven years of famine will
consume the land.” Pharaoh gave great authority to Joseph
who led a program to store up all the food during the time
of great abundance so there was enough bread in the land of
Egypt during the seven years of famine to share with people
from other lands.
Today most of us collectively choose through our societal
behavior to be the instruments of change – rapid change.
In this manner some claim to be acting in accordance with
God’s plan. Our society follows a belief that the biosphere
can be managed and manipulated for maximum profit. But what
are just profits and who will share them?
Armed with conviction that we know enough and have unlimited
energy and resources, we move forward following the path of
least resistance. Rather than acting in accordance with a
divine plan for creation, it seems like we really have just
chosen to live two lives; one outside of our religion and
the other within our religion during the often little time
we put aside for our faith.
To maintain such a bipolar existence it seems that our actions
must be controlled by our frame of reference. Like choosing
reading glasses to focus on that which is close, we choose
to relate to what we see in our own present experience and
context. So it is difficult much of the time to base values
on needs of future generations or costs of accumulating externalities
like environmental degradation.
Too often we see things in black and white; as comfortable
or uncomfortable; right wing or left wing; evil or good. On
this basis, we choose sides and pick our favorite issues,
often with a personal more than an ecological and truly spiritual
perspective. The net outcome is a chaotic sum of actions based
on our individual, rather than community, perspectives. So,
like riding a rocket accelerating into space with an uncertain
fuel supply, we really haven’t figured out where we’re
going together and whether we’ll ever reach a sustainable
condition for life.
In biblical times fossil fuels were unknown. People could
not know of the changes and events to come many centuries
later. It is interesting that the eastern Mediterranean region
suffered severe deforestation during the Bronze Age because
the demand for wood fuel exceeded the available wood supply.
This is referred to as the “Peak Wood” crisis
today by those who draw analogy to today’s “Peak
Oil” concerns. Of course “Peak Wood” was
a regional problem whereas “Peak Oil” is a global
concern. The Bronze Age culture collapsed because the wood
supply was depleted. Eventually the Iron Age (circa 1300BC)
led up to the time of the Roman Empire.
Was Christ aware of the profound ecological changes that
had occurred in the region as a result of human activity centuries
before? Regardless, we can wonder how he would have responded
to a vision of our future exploitation of fossil fuels for
momentary luxuries for a relative few, while ignoring the
Common Good, and degrading ecosystems.
Certainly, Jesus in both word and act taught the need for
sharing and conserving limited resources. Consider today’s
scripture reading from John (John 6: 1-13) in which five loaves
of bread provided by a boy are shared among 5000. And when
they had eaten their fill, Jesus told his disciples “Gather
up the fragments left over that nothing may be lost”.
And what they saved filled twelve baskets.
Today, as world grain stocks are decreasing to levels of
concern, too few of us ponder the costs and benefits of shifting
grains from food to biofuel production to make up for declining
oil reserves. Our desire for easy solutions can lead us to
unproductive outcomes. Biofuels like ethanol may ultimately
provide some degree of truly sustainable energy but realistically
can not allow continuation of the present rates of transportation
fuel use. And, contrary to what many believe, combustion of
biofuels will not help significantly reduce greenhouse gas
emissions if we intend to continue our present wasteful and
escalating use of energy. The increasing carbon dioxide levels
in the atmosphere are largely determined by the rate at which
the gas is delivered to the atmosphere from all sources, including
burning of fuels derived from plants and deforestation. Beware
of strategies that assert business as usual on the basis of
a cornucopian view that assumes that technological fixes are
certain to be found.
Rather than looking at energy depletion, climate change,
and ecological damage as things we need to fix by just expending
more energy and using more non-renewable resources, we need
to confront the real problem which is how to change our behavior
when we realize that such is required. True conservation of
resources should be the defining virtue of a sustainable society.
Those who are convinced that we have a looming global crisis
are torn between alternative approaches to addressing this
problem. All are united in concern but differ in views of
what human responses are possible. Many have observed that
the space between denial and hopelessness seems terribly small
for most people faced with the reality of finite energy and
material resources coupled with climate and ecological vulnerabilities.
Acceptance of responsibility for our individual, but incrementally
significant contributions to a biosphere out of balance can
lead to positive changes in our personal behavior. The hopelessness
seems to flow from an insular lack of trust that others will
do the same and that such will be sufficient.
Richard Heinberg in his book “Powerdown” listed
four options for personal and societal responses to declining
energy resources. “Last One Standing” and “Waiting
for the Magic Elixer” are pretty much the responses
that the world is likely to follow in the absence of a renaissance.
“Powerdown” is the path of cooperation, conservation,
and sharing, and “Building Lifeboats” is the path
of community solidarity and preservation of knowledge and
cultural values. A combination of “Powerdown”
and “Building Lifeboats” at local, regional, national,
and global levels is most desirable but requires extraordinary
actions and commitments ten to twenty years in advance of
resource declines or irreversible turning points in climate
change. Many believe that we are already well within that
needed time period for positive response and preparation and
therefore we are already in a crisis mode. It seems that religious
communities should be more helpful in supporting positive
transitions in collective human behavior.
Mark 14: v22 relates: “While they were eating, Jesus
took bread, gave thanks and broke it and gave it to his disciples,
saying, “Take it; this is my body.” This symbolic
act is repeated in communion services which remind us that
we are all a part of the body of Christ; that is, part of
the greater Church. All must participate and contribute harmoniously
in order to give the body life and purpose. So this is about
what we do together to worship; to promote truth and unity;
to use our God-given spiritual and material gifts to care
for creation; and to love one another like all our lives depend
upon it.
The Gospel of John (John 20, v19-22) relates that Jesus breathed
on the disciples in the upper room in which he appeared after
the crucifixion. He told them that he was sending them out
as his father had sent him. Jesus inspired the disciples by
breathing his own breath into them and thus set into motion
one of the most powerful potential forces for good the human
spirit has ever known. Remarkably, much of Christ’s
breath is still in active circulation and it is probable that
every breath of air we inhale today contains gas molecules
that Jesus exhaled. Not only that, the food we eat contains
carbon atoms from Christ, recently extracted as carbon dioxide
from the atmosphere by plants in our food chain. Let us not
forget that carbon is the element of life. In this way, our
daily bread does contain the body of Christ which ultimately
allows us to live and exhale breaths of Christ. What a finite
world we live in that we are interconnected so intimately
with great voices of the past and can pass them on. Yet our
huge fossil fuel based carbon dioxide releases into the atmosphere
take on new symbolic meaning in the course of diluting the
breaths of Christ in the air we breathe and the body of Christ
in all living things.
Personal steps to conserve resources and communicate concerns
are very worthwhile actions; essential for growth of public
awareness and building confidence that community based actions
can succeed. Ultimately, collective societal acceptance and
participation is required. We can choose to follow the body
and breaths of Christ (and all other great faith teachers)
to join one another in harmonizing and amplifying our personal
efforts to reach this goal.
Let there be rejoicing and joy every time we take a step
forward on this path down from the peak. May the Church not
be just a place for personal coping, but rather, a light for
all together to find the way to a new world of peace, justice,
love, and ecological stability. O God, help us to find ways
to be stronger together than we can be as individuals.
Body of Christ/breaths of Christ: the future of all life
depends on what we collectively do, with all that we have
been given, to care for creation.
This is the greatest challenge.
|